When I was deciding which blocks to use at the fabulous Summer School (three whole days of hatmaking - bliss!) it struck me that I’m becoming more adventurous in my choices. Partly this is down to experience; initially it’s hard to envisage what a finished hat will look like just by holding a lump of carved wood above your head. But I think it’s also partly down to seeing hats with complete outfits on vintage pattern envelopes.
For years hats featured heavily in pattern illustrations, only disappearing as hat-wearing became less common. Patterns for blouses and more casual clothing such as housecoats were hat-free, but with dresses and suits a hat was almost essential. In fact, so many of my vintage patterns feature hats in their illustrations that for this post I decided to look only at Vogue patterns.
What follows is a very picture-heavy post; so make yourself comfortable, and prepare to enjoy lots of hatting goodness!
Naturally outdoor clothing such as these capes would be worn with a hat.
![]() |
1938 |
There may have been a war on, and hats may have been expensive and hard to come by, but Vogue Patterns clearly saw no reason to let standards slip.
![]() |
1940 (left) and 1942 (centre and right) |
Post-war, hats were definitely back. From large (and carried) . . .
![]() |
1947 |
. . . to small . . .
![]() |
1948 |
. . . to medium-sized and veiled.
![]() |
1951 |
Occasionally, the odd hat-free illustration began to appear (although being without gloves for a formal occasion was clearly unthinkable).
![]() |
1954 |
But hats were still the norm.
![]() |
1954 |
Designer patterns seem to have featured especially extravagant creations, in both drawing and photograph.
![]() |
1955 |
I particularly like this example (although I imagine it would be very hard to make!).
![]() |
1956 |
There is a block very similar to this shape in the Hat Works collection. Unfortunately it's a bit small for me.
![]() |
1957 |
At first glance, this Vogue Basic Design appears to be hat-free.
![]() |
1960 |
But the illustration continues on the envelope back.
![]() |
Not one but two hat examples |
In the early 1960s hats still appeared in illustrations.
![]() |
1961 |
But the increasingly bouffant hairstyles which also featured just don't look compatible with hat-wearing.
![]() |
1963 |
Not that this troubled the 'young fashionables', or perhaps the hat was chosen to accommodate the hair. I love the way the previous owner of this pattern has experimented with different crown shapes!
![]() |
1964 |
A beehive-shaped crown seemed to be the solution on this pattern as well (with a illustration "Photographed in Rome").
![]() |
1968 |
Massive halo brims were obviously also a feature of the late 1960s.
![]() |
1968 |
They weren't just a flight of fancy by the illustrator, either. Blocking this hat must have been very hard work.
![]() |
1969 |
By the early 1970s, more pattern illustrations were hat-free. Not all of them, though.
![]() |
1972 |
But by the late 1970s even designer patterns, which tended to be more formal, often did not feature hats in either the photograph or the illustration.
![]() |
1977 |
And by the 1980s pattern envelopes were back where this post began, with hats only appearing with outdoor clothes.
![]() |
1986 |
* - It is indeed hatmaking, because I am making hats from scratch. My step-great-grandmother, Granny T, and my great-aunt, were all milliners however, because they were trimming hats which had already been made.
Oh now I want to pull out all of my patterns and look at the hats on them! I do the the super wide halo hat in the centre of the three from the early 1940s.
ReplyDeleteI went to Guy Morse-Brown's open day a couple of weeks ago and fell in love with a really quirky hat block. Georgina from Atelier Millinery was there and told me it's the most complicated block to make a hat on that they produce. Typical me, always got to choose the hardest one to do! xx
Why am I not surprised about the hat block (in a good way of course!)?
DeleteBelieve me, this was only a selection. Pretty much every one of my older patterns has a hat in the illustration. xx